Lawsuit for Black Media Inclusion to be Heard by US Supreme Court Nov. 13

By Barrington M. Salmon

( – In the 26 years that he’s been building his media empire, comedian and businessman Byron Allen has seen first-hand the panoply of ways that African-American and non-white media entrepreneurs have been shut out of the game by their powerful White counterparts and other gatekeepers.

Allen, 58, a respected global business leader, sits atop a burgeoning media giant, Entertainment Studios, which includes nine digital cable networks, 43 syndicated TV shows, 21 regional sports networks, The Grio, the Weather Channel – which he bought for $300 million – and other media properties said to value about $1 billion.

Despite his successes, Allen, in his lawsuit, argues that Comcast refused to carry any of his company’s channels because of his race. He filed suit in 2015 after being approached by Obama administration officials which asked if Comcast and Charter Communications were good corporate citizens.

“I didn’t just tell them no, I said hell no,” Allen has recounted in numerous interviews. “They said how do you figure? Well, the industry spends $70 billion in licensing cable networks. $70 billion and African American-owned media get zero. And that’s not fair. They said we hear that a lot. They asked what I’m willing to do. They said people were afraid to speak up because of repercussions and I said I’ll speak up and do it in a way that it wouldn’t be a problem again. So, I filed a lawsuit.”

Allen sued Comcast in federal court for $20 billion and Charter Communications for $10 billion. Judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals siding with him twice; that’s when Comcast petitioned to Supreme Court. Justices will hear the case on November 13, 2019.

All he seeks, Allen has said repeatedly, is economic inclusion, a chance to sit at the table and have an influential in determining the narrative and controlling the images that Black people see on their TV screens, tablets, cell phones or other devices.

“Comcast, which makes billions of dollars annually from African-American subscribers, has taken the position that a plaintiff must show that racial discrimination was the only, 100 percent “but for” reason not to do business with African Americans,” Allen said in an August 20 guest column in Deadline. “In other words, Comcast argues that an African American-owned business must show not only that the defendant considered race (which the statute forbids), but that the professed, hypothetical race-neutral reasons that could have motivated the defendant are false.”

He said he is concerned that if the Supreme Court favors Comcast, the impact will make it much harder for him and 100 million other Americans to secure economic inclusion now or in the future.

Allen, chairman, founder and CEO of Entertainment Studios notes in his lawsuit the importance of Section 1981 of the Act, which says that all people should have “the same right … to make and enforce contracts … as is enjoyed by white citizens.”

He has expressed confidence that he’ll win in the Supreme Court but the decision by the Trump administration’s Department of Justice to file an amicus (friend of the court) brief in support of Comcast and their reasoning for doing so has raised the stakes considerably and ratcheted up concerns by Civil Rights organizations, legal scholars and other interested parties of the potential harm to African Americans and others who have been protected by this law for the past 153 years.

“This is an extremely consequential case. This law was the first action the nation took to give Black people access to economic power,” said political commentator and author Dr. Avis Jones-DeWeever. “A White supremacist organization and the DOJ – which has inserted itself into this this case – wrote a brief that would kill our ability to fight discrimination.”

“It’s a big deal. The extent to which we can put pressure on Comcast, we must do so, so they agree to settle the case.”

Cori Harvey, a Florida-based attorney who specializes in business law, economics and entrepreneurship, said the case could be consequential.

“This could represent a significant lowering of the barrier to justice,” Harvey told Trice Edney News Wire. “It’s a fundamental question of who has access to legal recourse. The defendant has information needed such as if anything happened in emails, correspondence, etc. The plaintiff is in the dark. There’s power in darkness in shielding the defendant.”

“This represents a redistribution of power from the plaintiff to the defendant. He’ll be able to get access to emails, correspondence … this forces them (Comcast) to deliver into the public sphere information previously hidden. The Ninth Circuit gave Mr. Allen a shot. It forces Comcast to open secret chambers. That doesn’t happen too often. The ability to shield and hide equals power. This leaves Comcast exposed and vulnerable.”

Comcast officials have dismissed Mr. Allen’s claims, saying race had nothing to do with rejecting Allen’s channels, noting that they had low ratings and were of low quality. Comcast spokesperson Sena Fitzmaurice responding to a reporter’s query said: “This case arises from a frivolous discrimination claim that cannot detract from Comcast’s strong civil rights and diversity record or our outstanding record of supporting and fostering diverse programming from African American-owned channels. We have been forced to appeal this decision to defend against a meritless $20 billion claim but have kept our argument narrowly focused. We are not seeking to roll back the civil rights laws – all we are asking is that the court apply Section 1981 in our case the same way it has been interpreted for decades across the country.”

A slew of Civil Rights organizations, the National Association of Black Journalists, presidential candidates Sens. Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, plus eight of the 55 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, have signed on as friends of the court.

Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said on Twitter “Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 is literally one of the nation’s oldest civil rights statutes. We are proud to stand with @[email protected]_LDF & @civilrightsorg in calling on the #SCOTUS to reject Comcast’s attempt to cut the heart of this historic law. @LawyersComm.”

Clarke described the case elsewhere as “the most important civil rights case to be heard by the Supreme Court in term. A negative ruling stands to all but shut the courthouse door on a vast number of victims of discrimination all across the country.”

Los Angeles Urban League President and CEO Michael Lawson said what Comcast is doing is a clear violation of a clear violation of the 1866 act which prohibits racial discrimination in business dealings.

“We are appalled by your decision to challenge and destroy the federal civil rights statute of 1866 in the U.S. Supreme Court and do so in partnership with the Trump Administration’s Department of Justice,” Lawson said in a recent letter sent to Comcast chairman Brian Roberts and senior executive vice president David Cohen. “If you choose to continue your attempt to eviscerate this civil rights law, we will have no choice but to call for a boycott of everything Comcast, effective immediately.”



  1. Perry Westbrook on November 6, 2019 at 10:44 am

    Together we stand divided we fall what does it take for are human race to be as one!

  2. Lydia on November 6, 2019 at 9:05 pm

    Go For It BROTHER!!!

  3. Tanisha Yvonne Blair on November 7, 2019 at 1:50 am

    It is sad to see that our President rather spend his time helping a business go against a civil rights violation. Instead of writing a letter going against Mr. Allen , why not just stay out of it. But getting DOJ To write a letter. R u SERIOUS. Shouldn’t he be meeting with countries or sumthn. He always seems to show his tru colors every chance he gets. Sad. SMDH. He does not belong in the White House. He is nothing but a bad hair wearing, prejudice bully.

    • Vincent on November 7, 2019 at 6:00 pm

      To be Clear, The current President(Donald Trump) has not Specifically ordered or requested the DOJ to write the letter nor did he himself. It was Comcast who asked the DOJ to do so on there behalf NOT the president. In fact Tanisha, he is not involved in this case in any way shape form or fashion. He Did not get the DOJ to write a Letter Serioulsy that’s FACT. He’s constantly meeting with Countries. Trust me if was involved in this case like claimed he is the Fake News MSM would be talking about it no doubt. He was voted for president by over 60+ million Americans so he definitely belongs in the WH. Before you call someone prejudice please back it up with proof.

      • Kyle on November 9, 2019 at 5:56 am

        You write what sounds like Russion Troll propaganda. Trump was elected by a minority of voters. He lost the popular vote.

        I would like for Byron Allen to be victorious. The US, needs to be what it says it is.

      • Delisha Evans on November 13, 2019 at 5:43 am

        I think you are missing the point that the DOJ is getting involved in this case regardless if asked or volunteered. Comcast is giving 10 minutes of their time to the DOJ already having 30 minutes to present to the Justices. Wake up and smell the coffee, this is one of many tactics to undermine Allen’s argument. Byron Allen won twice in the lower court again is Comcast and Charter. Byron Allen has asked to sit down with Comcast and they refused. So, this very introduction of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 is a very underhanded move.

  4. Bernice Di xon on November 11, 2019 at 11:36 am

    I just heard about this law suit last night. The involvement of the Trump administration to be able to help overthrow a civil rights law is the worst thing that could every happen to this country.
    I wondered why this news is not publicized in the main stream media . If Comcast and Charter wins their Law suit in the Supreme Court, it will turn back the clock for the black race and other minorities. Everyone should be concern, no matter what race or gender you are.

    • Kathy Powell on November 14, 2019 at 8:09 pm

      I agree with the previous statements, this does not only affect Blacks now however I concerned about our children and the next generation to come. Any minority should be concerned! This will change how the world operates.As Blacks it is difficult to receive small business loans. Moreover a person from another country can reap the benefits in this country! WE ARE STANDING ON THE BACKS OF OUR ANCESTORS HOWEVER WE NOT OUR ANCESTORS WE WILL STAND AND SUPPORT THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1866 SECT 1981 WHICH WE FOUGHT SO HARD TO SUSTAIN! BLESSINGS

Leave a Comment