Trump’s Plans to Weaken Environmental Protections Would Harm Black Communities

Keith Rushing

By Keith Rushing

 

The Trump administration has made clear that it plans to limit environmental protections and reverse course on the stronger regulations achieved under President Barack Obama out of concern for the bottom lines of corporate America.

Mainstream media has covered Trump’s decision to prioritize private profits over public health and the well-being of our environment. But media attention hasn’t focused on the impacts to African Americans across the U.S. who face a greater environmental burden than white Americans.

Unfortunately, black communities are more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher levels of pollution because of the proximity of our neighborhoods to landfills, highways, refineries or coal-fired power plants.

A University of Minnesota study showed that nitrogen dioxide, a pollutant produced by cars and heavy industry and linked to asthma and heart disease, is more prevalent even in well-off communities of color than in white communities with similar income levels.

Furthermore, the majority of the nine million people living near hazardous waste sites are people of color.

Trump’s EPA, under the direction of EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, decided last month to reverse course on nearly two dozen environmental rules. And with some of them the correlation to public health in black communities is abundantly clear. 

Last month, Pruitt was granted a delay in defending the ozone or smog standard from lawsuits by polluter and conservative states that sought to keep the strongest-ever ozone standard from being implemented. Ozone, a deadly pollutant emitted by cars, trucks and factories, causes asthma attacks. And the 2015 standard, established under Obama, was attacked immediately through federal lawsuits by polluters and conservative states, which argued that it was unnecessary, even though the EPA’s scientific research showed that hundreds of lives would be saved by the tougher measures.

One in six black children has asthma, the highest prevalence of any racial group.  African Americans are also three times as likely as whites to end up in the emergency room or die from asthma. 

So the impact of failing to protect the nation from ozone pollution is quite clear for our communities. 

The Trump administration also asked the federal court to delay its defense of the first-ever mercury and air toxics standard which limits pollution, like lead and mercury, from coal-fired power plants. Like the ozone standard, the 2012 mercury and air toxics standard, was attacked by industry through litigation.

This pollution from coal-fired plants is no laughing matter. It is linked to heart disease, asthma and developmental and learning disabilities among babies and children. And this is particularly important for African Americans. For example, an NAACP study found that the majority of the six million people living near coal-fired power plants are low income and people of color.

Scientific research under the Obama EPA showed that 11,000 premature deaths would be avoided by implementing the mercury and air toxics standard.  But as with many environmental regulations, polluting industries that have to spend more to reduce the pollution they spew into communities do whatever they can to reverse or weaken these protections. 

We must understand that diseases like asthma and heart disease don’t just happen. When decisions are made about where polluting industries should be placed, our communities too often end up in the cross hairs. We must be vigilant about the need to stand up for environmental protections: Our lives are at stake.


 

Keith Rushing writes about the environment and public health for Earthjustice. His work has appeared in Ebony.com and the Huffington Post.

 

 

 

Leave a Comment